• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Biomimetic Dentistry

Less drilling! More healing!

  • Home
  • Literature
    • Thermo Cure
    • Mineralisation
    • Toxicity
    • Biocompatibility
    • Clinical Experiments
    • Compressive Strength and Flexual Strength
    • Core Builds Ups
    • Test Protocols
    • Coating
    • Sealants
  • How To Make
  • Videos
  • News
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Calendar
  • Home
  • Literature
    • Thermo Cure
    • Mineralisation
    • Toxicity
    • Biocompatibility
    • Clinical Experiments
    • Compressive Strength and Flexual Strength
    • Core Builds Ups
    • Test Protocols
    • Coating
    • Sealants
  • How To Make
  • Videos
  • News
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Calendar

Effect of three different core materials on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated deciduous mandibular second molars: an in vitro study

5 January 2012 //  by Biodentistry.eu//  Leave a Comment

Shah P, Gugwad SC, Bhat C, Lodaya R.

Source

Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, BVDU Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra India. preetamshah@hotmail.com

Abstract

Endodontic treatment makes the tooth brittle due to loss of bulk of tooth structure, decrease in the moisture content of dentin and dentin elasticity. The following study was carried out to evaluate the effect of endodontic treatment on the fracture resistance of the tooth and reinforcing ability of three different core materials. The following study comprised of sample size of 30 deciduous second molars divided into control group (6) and test group (24). Access opening was done in 24 and 18th teeth with access opening were restored with three different core materials namely IRM (6), silver amalgam (6), GIC (6). All the 30 were subjected to fracture test using UTM (Universal testing machine)- Instron 95. Result showed a drastic reduction in the fracture resistance of the tooth on access opening (1/3rd) and out of the three core materials glass ionomer was shown to be the best core material giving the highest fracture registrance followed by silver amalgam and IRM.

 

PMID: 22430696 [PubMed – in process] 1.         J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Jan 1;13(1):66-70.

Category: Core Builds Ups

Previous Post: « The crushing truth about glass ionomer restoratives: Exposing the standard of the standard
Next Post: 2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a tooth restoration component, exerts its genotoxic effects in human gingival fibroblasts trough methacrylic acid, an immediate product of its degradation »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Upload

Click here to upload a picture

Mineralisation In Vivo

Latest News

  • SMART Pedodontic Conference 2023 2 September 2023
  • VIII Scientific and Training Conference of Pediatric Dentistry 2 September 2023
  • Biomimetic Dentistry at Smiles World 2 September 2023
  • Effects of storage media on the flexural strength of GIC 5 June 2020
  • Biomimetic Dentistry in Indonesia 18 January 2020

About

Biomimetic Dentistry is a new way of dentistry which takes advantages of the natural mineralization processes in the mouth without using harmfully products.

Copyright © 2023 · Powered by Ter Hoeven Services